Violence and the Kingdom of God

March 28, 2008 at 4:19 am (Uncategorized)

I’ve been thinking and reading lately about violence, war, the Kingdom of God, etc, and the question I’ve been trying to work through is: Should Christians use violence, or does violence fit in the kingdom of God.  Here are some points from scripture that point me away from violence as a tool in the kingdom of God.

-In Matthew 5:38-48, Jesus tells his audeince that instead of following the rule of eye for eye and tooth for tooth, they should instead give up their right for personal justice by turning the other cheek, giving more than is demanded when someone tries to get something from you, and going the extra mile.  These are not ways of being passive, but are rather ways of standing up to injustice in a nonviolent manner.

 Also in the passage, Jesus tells his audience that they are not just to love their friends, but that they are to love their enemies as well, and pray for their enemies-because this is how God treats his enemies.

It seems clear to me that Jesus is teaching a nonviolent enemey love to his followers.  And it seems equaly clear that Jesus does not see this as some impossible ideal that we should just throw aside, because to conclude the sermon that these admontitions are contained in, he tells his audience that if they are wise they will put his teachings into practice.  Clearly Jesus intends for his teachings to be lived out.

 So a question is-How can we love our enemies if we are killing them?

-Several times in scripture we are told to return evil-not with evil-but with love.

-When asked if he was the king of the Jews, Jesus answered, “My kingdom is not of this world. If it were, my servants would fight to prevent my arrest by the Jews. But now my kingdom is from another place.” Jesus says that the difference between a world kingdom and His kingdom is that in Jesus’ kingdom his followers do not use violence to achieve victory or fight for each other.

-There is a tremendous contrast between the Roman Empire and Jesus ‘ Kingdom.  Many of the words that are used in Jesus kingdom are also used in the Roman empire-but to achieve different ends. 

Like Son of God-The Son of God was more than just Jesus’ title, it was a politcal title as well.  Caesar Augustus was claimed to be the son of god because of his peace achieved through military victories.

Faith-For the romans, faith was what the Roman people put into the Roman Empire-they had faith in the Pax Romana-or the peace of Rome, a peace that was brought through violence and military might.

Ekkesia-Greek for church-was also a word used for a Roman province that gave allegiance and worshiped Caesar.

Gospel or Good News-The Romans used this term to refer to an heir being born or that a battle had been won.

 Also, the procession that was used to inaugurate a new Caesar-Mark uses this same format in his Gospel to tell the story of Jesus cricifixion.  Caesar is being announced as the triumphant Lord-Jesus the suffering servant Lord.

-In Jesus temptation, Jesus overcomes temptation to use power and might to establish his kingdom.

-In the Garden, Jesus resists the temptation to overcome his victories though military might.

-The Epistles point to Jesus death on the cross not only as our means of salvation, but also as an example to be followed.  Peter says in chapter 3 of 1 Peter, 21To this you were called, because Christ suffered for you, leaving you an example, that you should follow in his steps.
 22“He committed no sin,
      and no deceit was found in his mouth.”[e] 23When they hurled their insults at him, he did not retaliate; when he suffered, he made no threats. Instead, he entrusted himself to him who judges justly. 24He himself bore our sins in his body on the tree, so that we might die to sins and live for righteousness; by his wounds you have been healed. 25For you were like sheep going astray, but now you have returned to the Shepherd and Overseer of your souls.”

Here Peter talks about Jesus suffering and death both as the source of our salvation and as an example to be followed.

In Phil 2 Paul tells us that we are to have the same attitude as Christ who “being in very nature God,
      did not consider equality with God something to be grasped,
 7but made himself nothing,
      taking the very nature of a servant,
      being made in human likeness.
 8And being found in appearance as a man,
      he humbled himself
      and became obedient to death—
         even death on a cross!”

However, the real issue is bigger than violence-it’s that as Christains we are called to love, to love sacrificially, even our enemies.

We often talk about how as Christians our calling is different from the world, and how we are to live differently than the world-such as the way we live sexually(don’t fool around on your spouse, no sex outside of marriage), the way we handle our money(give 10% to church, be generous, don’t live on more than you make), the way we treat our body (eat helthy, don’t ravage your body with drugs or alcohol abuse).  However, another big way we are to be different is by our love-a kind of love that would love even our enemies, even if they are hurting us (which they did to Jesus) or when they are hurting our friends (which happened to Peter, he tried to defend Jesus but was commanded to drop his weapon).  We want peace and justice, but we are also called to love others so much that we do not forsake them in the process of making peace.

 And the issue is-by  getting involved in war, by taking out enemies in our lives, by supporting something that oppresses or kills other people, by uniting the empire and the church so much that we become a fan of any war that our country champions-by doing these things, are we as the church destroying one of the very things that makes us so different from the way the rest of the world lives. 

Of course some violence seems more permissable, such as cops restraining people, but how much can violence be a part of our lives and still say that we are loving people as Jesus would love-a self sacrificing love.

The state is going to be the state, the issue here is not whether states should go to war, the issue is what should the church do?  Should we be saying that we will not afflict violence on another person?  Why? Because we are part of another kingdom.

3 Comments

  1. joe k said,

    Hey man, nice post. I agree with what you said, but I would add the question of what if God expects people to administer justice. Jesus never told soldiers their profession was a sin. Almost no one would argue that WWII was not a just war, if there is such a thing. Why would Christians not want to be the soldiers rushing onto Omaha beach to ‘administer justice’? Is it because Christians want others to get their hands dirty? Maybe I don’t trust God enough to punish people on His own, but I’m a fan of the philosophy of, “Give your soul to Jesus because your a## is mine!”
    Basically, I’m saying I don’t believe any sane person is a true pure pacifist in every situation, but it is wrong to be always looking for a fight. I do have a hard time pinning down the right middle ground, though.

  2. darthben said,

    Can I ask you Joe-do you think Jesus was a pacifist, or do you think that is a misinterpretation?

    I think an important question here is: Does Jesus expect us to administer justice? Does Jesus want us to be a part of making a better empire, or making America better, or does he want us to live our lives around the existence of another kingdom-the kingdom of God?

    Does Jesus expect us to administer justice to the world. Perhaps a parable of Jesus that applies to this question is the parable of the weeds where Jesus says, “The kingdom of heaven is like a man who sowed good seed in his field. 25But while everyone was sleeping, his enemy came and sowed weeds among the wheat, and went away. 26When the wheat sprouted and formed heads, then the weeds also appeared.

    27″The owner’s servants came to him and said, ‘Sir, didn’t you sow good seed in your field? Where then did the weeds come from?’

    28″ ‘An enemy did this,’ he replied.
    “The servants asked him, ‘Do you want us to go and pull them up?’

    29″ ‘No,’ he answered, ‘because while you are pulling the weeds, you may root up the wheat with them. 30Let both grow together until the harvest. At that time I will tell the harvesters: First collect the weeds and tie them in bundles to be burned; then gather the wheat and bring it into my barn.’ ”

    Here Jesus seems to be telling us to wait for him to administer justice. Although I am right with you Joe, I sometimes struggle with waiting for God to uphold justice. But as I quoted in my last post, grace is not just. It is not just that Jesus died for someone else’s sins, it is not just that we receive grace.

    Another question that is difficult but I think is very important is-how much can we be aligned with a kingdom of the world-such as America, or any country that any Christian happens to live in-and still be loyal to the kingdom of God. The kingdom of God and the worldly kingdoms are vastly different, so how far should we be invested in America (or any country) and still be loyal to the kingdom of God.

    Of course the best example of this tension, as you brought up, is WWII. What would have happened if good American Christians had not stood up to Hitler and conquered his regime? Well we could also ask another question-What if German Christians have refused to go along with Hitler’s ungodly ambitions, what if German Christians had refused to give their allegiance to Hitler rather than God?

    German Christians sinned by going along with Hitler and supporting his oppressive regime, but did God expect us to administer justice in that situation, or did he want us to wait for his justice? By taking out Germany and Japan the way we did, we did eliminate the weeds, but we also eliminated some wheat in the process too. And is eliminating the enemy even the goal in the kingdom of God.

    Lastly, Joe I just want to say that I think it’s cool that someone like you and someone like me can talk about this together-seeing that we are from vastly different perspectives and experiences.

  3. Rick Reiley said,

    Anyone can resort to violence, it takes no special calling. Christ showed us the ultimate example and laid down the course to follow very simply. Do good to those who persecute you, turn the other cheek, etc., He set a standard that for the vast majority of us is impossible to follow but we can still admire and aspire to it even if only in our dreams. ‘ Could the admonition to ‘render unto Caesar what is Caesar’s’ apply to human justice as Caesar (the government) sees fit? Is this where war comes into play? I simply can’t answer. But I know this…..when we stop wondering, working and striving to become better Christians we will be forever lost. Thanks so much for your blog. Keep up the good work.

Post a Comment